On demand · 11 minutes

Identifying and Preventing Contract Leakage in AP

See how contract terms, supplier invoices and accounts-payable processes drift apart—and how finance teams can identify and prevent the resulting leakage.

What this session covers

  • Why procurement and finance systems drift apart
  • Why PO matching doesn't prove contract compliance
  • Checking invoice lines against active agreements before payment

Key findings

  • Industry benchmarks estimate contract leakage at 2–5% of supplier spend each year.
  • Purchase-order matching is not the same as master-contract compliance.
  • Invoice line items should be checked continuously against active agreements.
  • Pricing variances can be surfaced and stopped before payment.

Summary

Angelina speaks with Miles about continuously verifying invoices against negotiated contract terms. The session explains how procurement and finance operating in separate systems can lead to invoices being approved against purchase orders rather than the master contract, and why traditional three-way matching does not prove contract compliance. It demonstrates how RedOwl extracts invoice line items, cross-references active master service agreements, flags pricing variances and stops overcharges before payment.

Speakers

Miles Karunanayake

Sales Development Representative

LinkedIn →

Angelina Tang

Business Analyst

LinkedIn →

More on-demand sessions

See RedOwl on your own data

RedOwl connects agreements, operational activity, billing, costs and payments to stop margin leakage before money moves.

Free on-demand access

Unlock the webinar library

One short form unlocks every RedOwl on-demand webinar on this device for 30 days. Nothing is sent by email.